Home» Posts tagged "prediction"

Real Estate Trends to Impact the United States in 2018

Posted on December 27, 2017 by Mike Kushner in Blog, CPBJ Articles, Trends No Comments

Note: This article was published by the Central Penn Business Journal. Click here to read the original version.

Rapid technological advancements and significant demographic shifts significantly influence the real estate industry. These various factors like growing urbanization, longevity of Baby Boomers and differentiated lifestyle patterns of Millennials are changing the way people value real estate. Add into the mix macroeconomic and regulatory developments, and you have the perfect storm for some significant changes to come to the real estate market in 2018.

With the many changes that have already taken place in 2017, many real estate companies find themselves searching for ways in which they can gain a competitive advantage and drive top- and bottom-line growth in the New Year.

To achieve this, we must identify and monitor emerging trends that are likely to impact the economy moving into 2018. Take a look at the top trends that are shaping the U.S. real estate industry right now!

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK: Increasing interest rates could temper growth

Federal Reserve is likely to raise interest rates in the short-to-medium term. Volatile global markets have led to continued low interest rates, but that’s expected to come to an end in 2018. Higher interest rates are likely to increase mortgage costs and could deter real estate investments to some extent.
Gross domestic product growth will likely increase 2.5 percent in 2018. It’s the same as in 2017, but better than the 2.1% growth in 2016. The modest economic improvement could temper the pace of commercial real estate (CRE) transaction activity.
Improving labor markets and household wealth will boost consumer confidence. The U-5 unemployment rate which includes discouraged workers and all other marginally attached is expected to drop under 5 percent. The employment-to-population ratio is projected to peak in 2018, as retiring Baby Boomers may reduce the share of employed.

REGULATORY OUTLOOK: Greater compliance means greater cost

Increased compliance and administration costs will result from the new accounting standards on lease accounting and revenue recognition that will primarily impact real estate investment trusts (REITs) and engineering and construction (E&C) companies.
Risk retention rules will lower issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS). We are also likely to see a reduction in capital availability in secondary and tertiary markets.
The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015 will ease REIT tax provisions and R&D tax credits for E&C companies, while increasing the flexibility to invest in startups for R&D experimentation. However, corporate tax reforms will reduce flexibility for corporations to spin off real estate assets into REIT structures.

DISRUPTIVE TRENDS: These factors are reshaping the face of CRE

Collaboration and Sharing.These sound like two positive trends, right? They certainly are for startups who utilize new platforms and business models like Airbnb or WeWork to reduce their real estate overhead. However, this type of collaboration and sharing of space is disrupting the way organizations lease and use commercial real estate space for their businesses. Traditional CRE companies will need to rethink their approach toward space design, lease administration, and lease duration in order to compete.
CRE data is becoming more ubiquitous and transparent thanks to technological advancements. The traditional brokerage model is being threatened by the increasing ease and efficiency of online leasing. Traditional brokers will need to diversify their services to include consulting and collaboration.
A growing demand for mixed-use developments as consumers prefer to “live, work and play” in proximity. This demand is the result of a shortage of workers with strong STEM skills, rising urbanization and Millennials’ preference for an open and flexible work culture. Companies trying to compete for this type of talent should choose office locations in areas that cater to the living and working environments preferred by their ideal candidates.
Rising demand for fast and convenient online retailing is disrupting the retail and industrial markets. Innovations in speed and mode of delivery (such as same-day delivery and e-lockers) will decrease the demand for large retail and industrial spaces. This trend will also cause a blurring of the lines between these two properties. For example, some retail space could double as fulfillment centers. To stay afloat, retailers will need to try different store formats to appeal to the consumer, while industrial properties should focus on smaller, more flexible spaces located near cities.
A change in how we get around will also change how we use real estate. With each passing year, more and more people rely upon “pay-per-use” vehicles and rideshare platforms like Zipcar, Uber and Lyft. We also get closer to self-driving vehicles. This major disruption to the entire mobility ecosystem will result in fewer people owning and driving their own vehicles, especially in urban areas. This will free up large parking spaces in prime locations that can be put to different uses. Real estate companies should begin to explore ways to reduce and repurpose parking space as a means to generate more income.

Over the course of the next 12 months, the U.S. commercial and residential real estate industry can expect to be hit with various changes and challenges. Some of these changes may have a favorable impact, while others could impose some serious setbacks. For real estate businesses to gain a competitive advantage and drive top- and bottom-line growth in 2018, they should take note of these emerging trends and work on developing a strategy now to react to the changing market, when the time comes.

What real estate trend do you think will have the most significant impact on the United States in 2018? Share your insights by leaving a comment below!

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 2017, 2018, buyers agent, central pennsylvania, commercial, demand, Economy, growth, industry, Mike Kushner, Omni Realty, prediction, regulation, residential, tenant representative, trends, united states

Current State of the U.S. Economy and Its Impact on Commercial Real Estate – Part II

Posted on December 12, 2017 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Commercial Real Estate, CPBJ Articles, Trends No Comments

Note: This article was published by the Central Penn Business Journal. Click here to read the original version.

Continuing with part II from our series on the health and future of the U.S. economy, we again welcome the knowledge and insight of Robert Calhoun. Robert is the Northeast Regional Economist for CoStar Group where he manages a team of economists and analysts tasked with producing research at a local, regional and national level on commercial real estate, the economy and capital markets.

Let’s now dive into what real estate market participants should be keeping a watchful eye on in 2018 – Be sure to also take a look back at part I from this series which focuses on the U.S. economy as a whole!

Omni: Debt drives real estate markets and there’s a flood of capital in the market right now. Is this a shoe waiting to drop?

I say that all the time: debt drives real estate markets. What you worry about from a capital markets standpoint is that a flood of capital leads to declining underwriting standards, and so far we aren’t seeing anything overly alarming on that front.

There has been some gradual loosening of underwriting standards in the CMBS space, but this has generally been met with demands of higher credit support by the rating agencies. Investors are still doing a good job of differentiating collateral and demanding higher yields for riskier deals. We are seeing a resurgence of CRE CLOs during this cycle, but the structure of these deals are much better than the previous cycle (simpler and easier to understand, more capital in the deals, etc.).

Omni: What is contributing to the widening gap between bid and ask prices in the commercial real estate market right now?

We’ve been watching the staring contest between buyers with dry powder and owners with big gains for some time. While many owners would probably like to take advantage of current valuations and harvest gains at low cap rates, they run the risk of having to redeploy that capital back out into the same market.

Many buyers, despite being flush with cash, are balking at current prices. And the deeper we get into this cycle, the harder it is to make deals pencil by assuming higher rents and higher occupancy into an uncertain future. I would say the widening of bid/ask spreads right now is a healthy thing, further evidence that market participants are staying somewhat disciplined.

A CRE investor has a couple of different dials he can toggle when making investment decisions: risk profile, return requirement, pace of investment. They are choosing to slow their investment pace instead of loosen their risk profile or lower their return requirements.

Omni: From a commercial real estate perspective, what are the most dramatic potential effects that we should brace ourselves for? In terms of the commercial real estate market, what will you be keeping a close eye on in 2018? What will be driving the volatility in 2018?

I’ll echo my comments from before: CRE fundamentals appear solid with no glaring red flags at the national level. The biggest risk to the commercial real estate market would be a sharp rise in interest rates, likely driven by an unforeseen pickup in inflation that causes the Fed to worry that it’s behind the curve. So far, inflation has been very well behaved.

I’ll be keeping a close eye on the unemployment rate and corresponding wage growth. At this stage in the cycle, with labor markets relatively tight, we’ve typically seen wage pressures materialize. As of the Fed’s most recent statement of economic projections, the Committee expects the unemployment rate to be 4.1% at the end of 2018. We are already at 4.1% as of October 2017. If the unemployment rate were to dip below 4.0% and inflation were to begin moving more quickly back toward the Fed’s 2.0% target, that could elicit a faster pace of rate hikes than is currently expected.

Omni: Do you think market participants are factoring the threat from technology into their investment decisions?

Technology is an interesting topic when it comes to commercial real estate. I think many market participants see CRE as an area of the economy that won’t be as easily “disrupted” by technology, but we’re already experiencing disruption! So much ink has been spilled over the Amazon effect on retail that I don’t need to say much here. WeWork and its $20B valuation, whatever you may think of it, is shaking up the office market. Even if a company doesn’t actually use WeWork space when they want to expand, couldn’t they take a page from their playbook and demand a shorter/more flexible lease in a traditional office building? How would that impact office valuations?

Technology like driverless cars won’t change people’s need to live SOMEWHERE, but it might change the shape of cities and neighborhoods, creating winners and losers. Technology is also changing the way investors think about real estate as an asset class. Priceline is currently valued at $84B while Marriott has a market cap of $46B. In that light, which his more valuable: owning the real estate or owning the customer relationship?

I’m hearing more chatter about how artificial intelligence and machine learning can begin to disrupt the CRE lending market, with algorithms taking the place of human underwriters. It’s easy to envision a company like Zillow disintermediating traditional real estate brokers by facilitating peer-to-peer home sales, and that same model could be extended into the commercial real estate market.

To answer your question (finally), I think it’s important for market participants to consider technological threats…but at the same time, nobody does a very good job of predicting an uncertain future! Picking winners and losers will be as challenging as always.

What appears to be most promising for 2018’s commercial real estate market? What is most concerning? Start a conversation by leaving a comment below!

In case you missed it, be sure to check out part I from our interview series with Robert Calhoun. In our first article, Robert shares insights into the health and future of the United States’ economy as a whole.

——————————————————–

Learn more about Robert Calhoun: Robert Calhoun is the Regional Economist covering the northeast for CoStar Group and is based in New York. Mr. Calhoun manages a team of economists and analysts tasked with producing research at a local, regional and national level on commercial real estate, the economy and capital markets.

Before joining CoStar, Mr. Calhoun was a director of research at Annaly Capital Management, the largest publicly traded mortgage real estate investment trust. There he was accountable for the creation of proprietary research on the US economy, monetary policy and the regulatory environment to drive investment decisions across a portfolio of real estate-related assets that at times was larger than $100 billion. Mr. Calhoun graduated from Clemson University with a Masters in economics and a BA in business management. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 2017, 2018, commercial realestate, costar, Economy, insight, local market, national market, prediction, recession, regional market, robert calhoun, technology

Current State of the U.S. Economy and Its Impact on Commercial Real Estate – Part I

Posted on December 7, 2017 by Mike Kushner in Blog, CPBJ Articles, Trends No Comments

Note: This article was published by the Central Penn Business Journal. Click here to read the original version.

With the GOP’s proposed tax bill on its way to conference committee to reconcile the House and Senate versions, Omni Realty Group chatted with CoStar’s Regional Economist for the northeast, Robert Calhoun, about the state of the U.S. economy.

For more than a decade, Robert has been an influential source of economic analysis as it relates to monetary policy and real estate markets. He manages a team of economists and analysts tasked with producing research at a local, regional and national level on commercial real estate, the economy and capital markets.

Through this two part series, Robert shares a wealth of knowledge and insight in his answers to our questions. Let’s take a look at what we can learn about the current state of our economy and the largest threats and opportunities we might encounter in 2018 – Be sure to stay tuned for part II from this series as we diver deeper into commercial real estate and the economy!

Omni: From your perspective, how has 2017 fared? Is the U.S. economy where you thought it would be?

2017 has been another solid year in this recovery. Through three quarters of 2017, real GDP growth has averaged about 2.2% year-over-year, roughly in line with the average since 2010. We are on pace to add another ~2mm jobs this year, and while the rate of job growth has slowed, it’s impressive that we’re still adding this number of jobs in the 8^th year of a recovery.

The unemployment rate is down to 4.1% as of October 2017, not only a new low for this cycle but the lowest level since 2000. I expected roughly average growth in 2017, as well as a gradual slowdown in job creation, but I didn’t expect the unemployment rate to fall as much as it has. This took the Fed by surprise as well.

At the end of 2016, the Committee projected the unemployment rate to reach 4.5% by the end of 2017, and I think I was also in that camp. The Fed expected to hike the Fed Funds rate 3 times in 2017, and they are on pace to do exactly that. This is notable: 2017 is the first year in this recovery where the Fed was able to hit their goals for the path of the Fed Funds rate.

Omni: What are your thoughts on Jerome Powell [President Donald Trump’s pick to be the 16th chairman of the Federal Reserve]?

In my opinion, what you get with Powell is monetary policy continuity, which is going to be important for a few reasons. 2018 has the potential to be a challenging year, so there is no reason to amplify that by bringing in a new Chair with radically different ideas about how policy should be implemented.

The Fed intends to begin slowly winding down its mortgage and treasury holdings starting in late 2017, and the taper is set to intensify throughout 2018. Markets are unsure how smoothly this will go, so sticking to the status quo should help smooth out potential volatility. Also, the voting composition of the FOMC swings decidedly more hawkish next year. Picking Powell, a centrist who is already well known to market participants, reduces uncertainty about how the Fed will act in 2018.

Omni: What’s the single biggest threat to the U.S. economy right now? Do you see an economic recession coming anytime soon?

While it would be easy to forecast a looming recession just because the expansion is 8 years old, I’ll paraphrase the Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen: expansions don’t die of old age. I’m not seeing any alarming imbalances as we have in certain past cycles, and monetary policy is still remarkably loose given how deep we are into this recovery. The biggest threat is probably an unexpected revival of inflationary pressures, which would cause the Fed to raise rates faster, and would cause a spike in interest rates that would be damaging to the economy.

Omni: Generally speaking, has increased regulation been a good thing?

Any increase or decrease in regulation has the effect of moving us along the spectrum between ease of doing business and increased stability. I think I can state, without causing much of an uproar, that going too far in either direction is a bad thing.

Prior to the financial crisis, we had probably gone too far in deregulating certain parts of the financial system, so the increase in regulation that followed is no surprise. That being said, we’re already seeing several bipartisan efforts to reduce the strain from increases in regulation. The House recently passed a bill that would “clarify and amend the High Volatility Commercial Real Estate bank capital rule.” Also, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-IA) is working with a handful of Democrats on a bill that would soften some parts of Dodd-Frank that are considered particularly hard on smaller regional and community banks. The government’s take on regulation is always a pendulum.

What particular insights did you find most compelling? Do you agree or disagree with Robert’s viewpoints? Start a conversation by leaving a comment below!

Now that we’ve taken a broad look at the health and future of the U.S. economy, stay tuned for part II of our interview series with Robert Calhoun to learn more specifically about how the economic climate and emerging technology stand to reshape the commercial real estate market in 2018 and beyond!

——————————————————–

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 2017, 2018, Commercial Real Estate, costar, Economy, federal reserve, forecast, prediction, recession, recovery, regulation, robert calhoun, united states

President Trump’s Predicted Impact on Commercial Real Estate

Posted on February 1, 2017 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Commercial Real Estate No Comments

With the transition into any new presidency, there is much change that will take place. As stock markets demonstrated, from the very first day of President Trump taking office, our economy will be highly impacted by his administration. Looking specifically at commercial real estate, there are several predictions we can make as to how Trump will impact the industry. Take a look!

Tax Reform

It was his main focus on the campaign trail and it will surely be his main focus in office. Trump is looking to implement substantial tax reform to “help the American people.” Now the details of what this reform really looks like is unknown; however, we can predict that real estate tax codes will be impacted. For example, Trump has proposed an across-the-board 15 percent tax rate for corporate or business income. This reduction will lessen the burden on business owners, including those in the real estate industry.

Carried Interest

While an across-the-board tax cut for corporate and business income is a welcome change, many real estate professionals are worried about what Trump will then do with carried interest. Carried interest, which is a managing partner’s share of the profits from a partnership, is taxed at the capital gains rate of 20 percent. If Trump should choose to eliminate this deduction and tax it as ordinary income, the sweat equity of real estate entrepreneurs would hold less incentive.

“We will eliminate the carried interest deduction and other special interest loopholes that have been so good for Wall Street investors, and people like me, but unfair to American workers,” Trump said in an Aug. 8, 2016, speech at the Detroit Economic Club.

1031 Like-Kind Exchange

1031 Like-Kind Exchanges are named for their particular section of the tax code. Under the current law, taxpayers who sell one property and buy a similar one may defer taxes on their profits for years. Trump has not taken a stand, either way, on 1031 exchanges, but the real estate industry should be wary as to whether this is another soft target that may come under fire when reforming taxes. Eliminating the deduction has the potential to add $1.2 trillion in tax revenue over a decade, but it could dramatically reduce real estate investment and decrease property values.

Compromise

The most obvious, but possibly the most important prediction is that any changes will require a good deal of compromise from all parties. No one is going to get everything they want exactly as they want it. This goes for the Trump administration, legislators and the American people. We may need to give in some areas in order to get something we really want. In commercial real estate, this may mean closing a loop hole, but benefitting from a larger tax break overall.

The full extent of the Trump administration’s impact remains to be seen, but the world is watching closely!

Do you have other predictions to add about how the Trump administration will impact commercial real estate? Join in the conversation by adding a comment below!

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 1031 exchange, 2017, carried interest, central pa, Commercial Real Estate, CRE, donald trump, harrisburg, industrial, Mike Kushner, office, Omni Realty Group, pennsylvania, prediction, president trump, retail, tax reform, taxes, trump

How Tenant-Only Broker Representation Will Shape the Future of Real Estate

Posted on December 8, 2016 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Tenant Representative/Buyer Agent No Comments

Note: This article was originally published by www.DukeLong.com. Click here to read the original version.

How Tenant-Only Broker Representation Will Shape the Future of Real Estate.

Tenant-only broker representation is quickly growing in popularity and moving into the mainstream of real estate. Now more than ever, people looking for space realize they need a broker to solely represent their interests. It doesn’t take much more proof than to examine the success of the two premier exclusive tenant rep firms that are now part of multi-billion dollar companies. The Staubach Company, founded by Roger Staubach who pioneered the specialty of tenant representation,was acquired by Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) and did $6 billion in revenue in 2015.

Studley, another firm offering exclusive tenant representation, was acquired by Savills, a global real estate powerhouse that did £1,283.5 million in revenue in 2015. If this trend continues, and I expect it will, other brokerage firms will need to adjust their practices to provide what clients want – fair and exclusive representation. Here is how I predict tenant representation to shape the future of real estate.

Technology will change the role of a tenant representative, but not replace it.

With technology making it easier than ever for potential tenants and buyers to find available properties, the future role of a tenant representative will be less about helping someone find space. Rather, tenant representatives will be sought out to provide advice, negotiate and exclusively represent the interests of the tenant/buyer.

Successful tenant representatives will use technology to streamline and automate the ways in which they research properties. This will allow them more time to reinvest in providing clients with their expertise and non-conflicting representation.

Large brokerage firms will need to “pick a side.”

In November 2016, the California Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that a listing broker had a fiduciary responsibility to both the buyer and the seller in a “dual agency” transaction. This case dealt with the 2007 sale of a Los Angeles home that was marketed as 15,000 square feet, but in reality was 11,000 square feet. The buyer reasonably felt like the brokerage company had pulled a fast one on him, especially since the house was both listed and sold by Coldwell Banker.

This court decision has potentially far-reaching impact on how commercial and residential real estate brokerages do business. While some may be able to continue doing business as usual and make their disclosures a little more apparent, the large brokerage firms may find it more difficult to do that and still be able to adequately represent both sides of a transaction. Essentially, large brokerage firms will need to pick a side. Will they represent the buyers or the sellers?

I predict we will see more real estate brokers choose to exclusively represent one side or the other so that they don’t risk the appearance of (or real) conflict of interest that just might result in a costly court battle.

Clients will get smart about seeking out exclusive representation.

Potential buyers and tenants are getting smarter about bringing their own representation to the table. Because of recent news stories and court cases, like the one mentioned above, light is finally being shed on the questionable practices of brokerage firms that represent both sides of a real estate deal. In nearly any other industry, this conflict of interest would never fly. Finally, real estate is catching up and buyers and tenants are seeking out exclusive representation to ensure a fair deal.

For many reasons, the growth in tenant-only broker representation is a good thing. It means tenants and buyers are getting equal representation in real estate transactions. It means companies are recognizing the conflict of interest in representing both sides and making changes to offer better transparency and disclosure clients. Finally, the growth in tenant-only broker representation means real estate professionals can and should specialize. People don’t want a Jack of All Trades, they want an expert who exclusively represents one side of a deal.

Note: This article was originally published by www.DukeLong.com. Click here to read the original version.

[Online Resources] Real Estate, blog, broker, buyers, central pennsylvania, changes, commercial, conflict of interest, duke long, exclusive, firm, future, impact, industrial, landlords, legal, news, office, Omni Realty Group, prediction, representation, residential, retail, space, tenant-only, tenants, trends, writing

Median Household Incomes Mostly on the Rise for Central Pennsylvania

Posted on September 26, 2016 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Local Market, Trends No Comments

According to the data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, released on September 15, Central Pennsylvania is following in suit with greater Philadelphia – and the rest of the nation – which is experiencing an increase in median household incomes. Taking into consideration Cumberland, Dauphin, Lancaster, Lebanon and York Counties, here are some of the most notable trends published in the report.

The highest median household income is Cumberland County at $63,890; in contrast, the lowest median household income is Lebanon County at $52,571. Lancaster County increased the most in the last year, by $1,859. Decreasing the most was Lebanon County, by $1,497.

Lancaster County has the lowest median income for Black or African American households at $32,445. While the lowest median income for Hispanic or Latino households is Lebanon County at $25,422. The greatest difference in median income between male versus female householder (with no spouse present) is $18,429 in Cumberland County.

For all counties, the highest median income was for householders between the ages of 45 to 64 years old and for households of married couple families. Also, female householders (with no spouse present) always earned less than male householders (with no spouse present).

If you’re curious what other trends emerged and what these trends tell us about the health of our local economy, let’s take a closer look at each county’s specific numbers.

Cumberland County, Pennsylvania

The 2016 median household income in Cumberland County is $63,890. This number is up from $62,759 in 2014 and is the highest median income we have seen this decade. For householders between the ages of 45 to 64 years old, the median income rises to $78,960. Households of married couple families have the highest median income at $87,714. A male householder with no wife present has a median income of $54,837. In contrast, a female householder with no husband present has a median income of just $36,408. Black or African American households had a median income of $32,661 and Hispanic or Latino households had a median income of $35,097.

Dauphin County, Pennsylvania

The 2016 median household income in Dauphin County is $54,232. Up from $52,975 in 2014, this number has been on an almost steady rise for the last decade. For householders between the ages of 45 to 64 years old, the median income rises to $63,373. Households of married couple families have the highest median income at $79,328. A male householder with no wife present has a median income of $46,430. In contrast, a female householder with no husband present has a median income of just $35,520. Black or African American households had a median income of $37,823 and Hispanic or Latino households had a median income of $33,947.

Lancaster County Pennsylvania

The 2016 median household income in Lancaster County is $59,262. This county experienced the greatest increase in the Central PA region over the last year. Rising from $57,403 by $1,859, this is also the highest number we have seen this decade, which is especially notable since median income took a dip in 2010, falling to $51,740.

For householders between the ages of 45 to 64 years old, the median income rises to $73,155. Households of married couple families have the highest median income at $78,218. A male householder with no wife present has a median income of $47,391. In contrast, a female householder with no husband present has a median income of just $36,925. Black or African American households had a median income of $32,445 and Hispanic or Latino households had a median income of $38,125.

Lebanon County Pennsylvania

The 2016 median household income in Lebanon County is $52,571. Down from 2014’s median income of $54,068, Lebanon County experienced several ups and downs throughout the past decade. For householders between the ages of 45 to 64 years old, the median income rises to $60,578. Households of married couple families have the highest median income at $73,219. A male householder with no wife present has a median income of $44,239. In contrast, a female householder with no husband present has a median income of just $34,383. Black or African American households had a median income of $34,662 and Hispanic or Latino households had a median income of $25,422.

York County, Pennsylvania

The 2016 median household income in York County is $58,409. This was another Central PA county that decreased since 2014, though ever so slightly by just $178 ($58,587 in 2014). With several ups and downs in median income, the number has still mostly been on the rise over the past decade.

For householders between the ages of 45 to 64 years old, the median income rises to $72,004. Households of married couple families have the highest median income at $81,711. A male householder with no wife present has a median income of $46,681. In contrast, a female householder with no husband present has a median income of just $33,911. Black or African American households had a median income of $44,525 and Hispanic or Latino households had a median income of $33,182

Our Analysis

Increasing median household income is just one trend that affects commercial real estate. The local employment gains continue to be strong, with seasonally adjusted unemployment rate holding below 5.0 percent. This adds to the demand for housing in a variety of forms: for office space, for the retail sector and for industrial/distribution facilities.

Underlying inflation is extremely tame, providing no impetus for significantly higher rates. Lending rates and fixed income rates of return will remain low by historical standards. For most metro areas (including Central Pennsylvania) and property types, lower oil prices have been a net positive. Spending less on gasoline encourages consumers to spend more on other items, which helps retail and hotel market fundamentals.

Lower prices directly translate into an increase in household disposable income. Overall, the commercial property market in 2017 will continue to be characterized by strong fundamentals, increased investor flows and high transaction volume.

What median income was most surprising to you? What do you think some these trends say about the health of our local economy? Share your thoughts by commenting below!

[Online Resources] Real Estate, analysis, average, budget, central pa, central pennsylvania, commercial, data, debt, facts, income, market, median, Mike Kushner, money, news, Omni Realty Group, pennsylvania, people, poverty, prediction, report, statistics, stats, trends

Central Pennsylvania’s Retail Real Estate Market Experiences Record-Setting Quarter

Posted on September 15, 2016 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Local Market, Trends No Comments

This quarter has posted some of the highest and lowest numbers we have seen since 2012. In Central Pennsylvania’s local retail real estate market, vacancy rate is low, rental rate is high and both net absorption and total RBA have increased. But overall, what does this tell us about the state of our economy and what we can expect in future quarters?

Let’s take a closer look at some of the record-setting numbers we experienced in Central Pennsylvania’s retail real estate market in 2016’s second quarter and what they mean to the health of the economy.

Select Year-to-Date Deliveries:

Coming in at number three on the list of select year-to-date deliveries is the retail property located at I-81 and Walker Road in Chambersburg. Phase I and II, delivered in Q1 2016, total 109,237 square-feet of space that is 92% leased (44,000 square-feet with 4,400 square-feet vacant). Some of the major tenants include Kohl’s, Target, Giant, Red Robin, Staples, PetSmart, Michael’s, Olive Garden, VisionWorks, ATT&T and many more. Palisades Development, LLC are currently processing LOIs for the remaining space. Phase III is planned and construction will proceed when leasing warrants.

At number 15 on CoStar’s list, is another Palisades Development, LCC retail property located at 968 Norland Avenue in Chambersburg. This 10,800 square-foot building is 100% occupied and was also delivered in Q1 2016.

Select Top Retail Leases:

On the list of Select Top Retail Leases, Harrisburg area east claimed the top spot. Listed at number one is the Harrisburg East Shopping Center with 69,954 square-feet of space. Although not listed by CoStar’s as a “Select Top Retail Lease” for this quarter, plans are in place for the Giant currently in Colonial Commons, to make a move 0.2 miles down Jonestown Road to the Harrisburg East Shopping Center into the retail space formerly occupied by Gander Mountain. This will provide more space for Giant and is already attracting additional retail businesses nearby including a CVS Pharmacy and potentially a fast-casual restaurant, reports KIMCO, owner of the shopping center.

Select Top Sales:

Only one of the nine Select Top Sales from April 2015-June 2016 is from the Central Pennsylvania submarket. The Shoppes at Susquehanna Marketplace sold for $44,000,000 to Clarion Partners. With an RBA of 110,365 square-feet, this came at a cost of $398.68 per square foot.

Additionally, the West Porte Center, listed by CoStar as a Select Top Retail Lease, is more accurately represented as a sale. PennDOT purchased 67,126 square-feet of land for a new Amtrak station in Middletown that is expected to be finished in 2018. This is estimated to be a $32 million project which will include features like a covered pedestrian bridge to provide direct access to Penn State Harrisburg’s campus.

Absorption and Demand:

Net absorption increased this quarter from 64,467 square-feet (in Q1) to 110,449 square-feet, currently. Total RBA also increased, though just slightly, from 88,822,714 square-feet (in Q1) to 88,854,312 square-feet, currently. Six buildings were delivered with a total RBA of 31,598 square-feet. Additionally, five buildings are under construction.

Vacancy:

This quarter, the vacancy rate decreased by 0.1% to 4.7%. This once again matches the vacancy rate of Q4 2015, which is the lowest rate the Central PA submarket has experienced since prior to Q3 2012.

Rental Rate:

The quoted rental rate increased this quarter by $0.11 to $12.00. This is the highest price per square-foot the local retail real estate market has experienced since prior to Q3 2012.

Our Summary/Analysis:

Q2 2016 provided to be an exciting and record-setting quarter for Central Pennsylvania’s retail real estate market. We experienced a recent record low for vacancy rate at 4.7% and a recent record high for quoted rental rate at $12.00 per square-foot. These two trends go hand in hand, so it’s no surprise they would correlate together.

Another positive indicator for the health of the retail real estate market is the increase in net absorption and total RBA. Though neither were record-setting per se, net absorption nearly doubled in a single quarter which is impressive in its own right. It’s safe to say that the market is growing in demand, increasing in price and is able to absorb the new buildings that have been delivered.

What trend do you think will have the greatest impact on the Central Pennsylvania retail market? Share your insight by commenting below!

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 2016, advice, analysis, blog, building, business, buy, commercial, Construction, costar, data, Economy, expert, facts, growth, lease, market report, Mike Kushner, new, news, numbers, Omni Realty, opinion, prediction, project, q2, retail, sale, second quarter, sell, space, statistics, store, trends

Central PA Proves Its Increasing Demand for Retail Real Estate Q4 2015

Posted on February 10, 2016 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Local Market No Comments

Retail real estate investors and consumers alike should be excited about the market trends we experienced in fourth quarter 2015!

There are several strong indicators that the local market is healthy, growing and catching the eye of some major retailers like Field and Stream. The highlights from the most recent quarter include the lowest vacancy rate since prior to 2012 even with a continual increase in inventory as four new buildings were delivered this quarter. Additionally, a positive and increasing net absorption demonstrates the market’s ability to handle the new space while still growing in demand.

What else can we learn from how the retail real estate market in Central PA performed at the close of 2015? Let’s take a look at more important trends worth noting…

Select Year-to-Date Deliveries:

Specifically this quarter, we saw two new retail spaces delivered to the Central PA submarket that made it to the top 15 list for the Philadelphia market. Coming in at number 11 is the retail building at 4250 Chambers Hill Road in Harrisburg. This 59,400 square-foot space is 100% occupied by Restaurant Depot. Coming in at number 12, the Central PA market gained a new Field and Stream near the Capitol City Mall in Camp Hill that delivered 50,000 square-feet of new space to the market and is also 100% occupied.

Select Top Sales:

Among the nine select top sales highlighted in the fourth quarter for the Philadelphia market, just one occurred in the Central PA submarket. The 171,069 square-feet Lowe’s building located at 250 S. Conestoga Drive in Shippensburg was sold by Excel Trust, Inc. to the ARC Companies for $24,250,000.

Vacancy:

In fourth quarter 2015, the vacancy square-footage and vacancy rate dropped ever so slightly from the previous quarter, but overall these are the lowest numbers we have seen since prior to 2012! The vacant square footage is 4,295,660 and the vacancy rate is 4.9%. This is the first time we are seeing the vacancy rate drop into the 4’s since at least four years ago.

Rental Rates:

2015 finished the year with retail rental rates at $11.71. While this did not set any all-time low or high records for recent quarters, it is a slight decrease from the $11.76 we ended with in the third quarter. With the highest peak in recent history occurring in the second quarter of 2015 at $11.88, it will be interesting to see if this decreasing trend continues into 2016 and beyond.

Absorption and Demand:

Net absorption increased this quarter to 227,275 square-feet. A total of four new buildings were delivered to the market (two we just discussed) which contributed an RBA of 124,295 square-feet. The total RBA of existing inventory rose to 87,242,952 square-feet which is the highest we have seen since prior to 2012. Historically, total RBA has been on a steady climb for nearly four years and counting.

Our Summary/Analysis:

Fourth quarter 2015 delivered good news and positive signs of growth for the Central PA retail real estate market. We experienced the lowest vacancy rate in recent history, dropping into the 4’s with a rate of 4.9%.

What’s most impressive is that this decreasing vacancy rate occurred during a quarter in which inventory also increased, four new buildings were delivered to the market and nine new buildings are still under construction. The positive (and increasing) net absorption tells us that the local retail market is well-poised to handle this new inventory and that businesses are growing and expanding into Central PA.

Based upon the activity in the Central PA submarket for retail real estate in fourth quarter 2015, what do you think will have the greatest impact on our local economy? Share your thoughts by commenting below!

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 2015, analysis, blog, commercial, Construction, costar, data, deliveries, expert, field and stream, fourth quarter, leases, local, lowe's, market, Mike Kushner, news, Omni Realty, opinion, prediction, q4, report, retail, sales, statistics, summary, trends

How Federal Interest Rate Hikes Will Impact the Commercial Real Estate Market

Posted on February 3, 2016 by Mike Kushner in Blog, CPBJ Articles, Local Market, Trends No Comments

Note: This article was originally published by the Central Penn Business Journal. Click here to read the original version.

By now you have likely heard about the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voting in December to raise the federal funds rate for the first time in almost 10 years. And if you haven’t, well, it’s time to take a crash course in what’s going on, and specifically how it will impact our local economy!

Mostly symbolic, this initial rate increase was just the first step in what will likely be a drawn-out process of monetary policy normalization. An important conclusion we can draw, is that it reflects the FOMC’s belief that the labor market is close enough to full employment.

While a 25-basis-point increase alone is not very significant, what matters most is where things head next. We can reason that the monetary policy, via the federal funds rate, will remain favorable in the near future. Also, current market conditions suggest inflation will remain below 2% for the next 10 years.

With a basic background as to what’s going on, let’s dive a little deeper into what this activity means for our economy, specifically for commercial real estate.

The Impact on Commercial Real Estate

It’s not the federal funds target rate or even the 10-year rate that impact commercial real estate the most, but rather economic growth and job creation. These factors have greater influence over lower vacancy rates and higher rental rates that really impact a building’s pro forma. Simply put, economic growth has a far greater influence on property values.

That’s not to say the commercial real estate sector hasn’t benefitted from the Fed’s massive injection of liquidity into the economy over the past seven years. Overall, prices have nearly recovered, and for some real estate segments, local markets prices actually exceed pre-recession peaks.

With the FOMC’s goal of normalizing interest rates, it’s reasonable to be concerned that rising rates will reduce investor demand for commercial real estate. However, I expect that commercial real estate prices and returns will continue to be attractive even in a rising interest rate environment.

More Than One Factor Impacting Interest Rates

There is more than one factor driving long-term interest rates. Take for example inflation (a major driver of longer-term yields) which is expected to remain low over the next decade. Additionally, our nation’s overall improving economic conditions, including a strong labor market, have helped to drive the Fed’s decisions. Nonfarm payrolls have increased by just more than 5.5 million jobs since the end of 2013. It is likely that 2014 and 2015 will be the strongest back-to-back job growth years since 1998 and 1999. Job growth is another major factor that continues to drive the improving leasing market fundamentals across the nation.

On a National Level

If we look to history for examples as to what to expect next, it’s that a rising federal funds rate has most often coincided with tightening commercial real estate markets and rising prices. Two similar instances have both been accompanied by rising office occupancy rates.

From 1993 to 2000 the federal funds rate rose from 3.0% to 6.5%. Office occupancy during that period increased from 79.6% to 90.9%. Similarly, from 2003 to 2007 the federal funds rate rose from 1.0% to 4.25% and office occupancy increased from 80.5% to 87.1%.

What we are currently seeing on a national level follows suit with these predictions. Commercial space is being absorbed, vacancy rates are falling and rental rates are rising. In third quarter 2015, the national office vacancy rate fell to 14.2%, its lowest level in seven years.

What’s Next?

According to F.N.B. Wealth Management, traders now believe the Fed is likely to hike rates just once in 2016, most likely not before September. This contrasts with earlier predictions that the Fed could move two or three times this year. As it pertains to commercial real estate, we should take this news in stride. Thus far, the federal interest rate hike has signaled a recovering economy and has not deterred investors and developers from diving into the market. An increase in absorption and rental rates and a decrease in vacancy rates are welcome side effects that are far more positive than what many other industries may be experiencing as a result of these economic changes.

For Central Pennsylvania’s commercial real estate investors, sellers and brokers, we should use what history has already taught us about the typical “tightening cycle” to our advantage to determine how we monitor and approach the market over the coming years.

Do you have an opinion on how federal interest rate hikes will impact the commercial real estate market at a local or national level? Join in the conversation by commenting below!

Note: This article was originally published by the Central Penn Business Journal. Click here to read the original version.

2016, article, bank, blog, central pa, central penn business journal, Commercial Real Estate, cpbj, data, Economy, federal, finances, guest column, hike, increase, industrial, interest rates, market, Mike Kushner, money, news, office, Omni Realty Group, pennsylvania, prediction, report, retail, statistics, treasury, trends, united states, writing

Robust Growth Predicted in 2016 for Central PA Industrial Real Estate Market

Posted on January 8, 2016 by Mike Kushner in Blog, Local Market, Trends No Comments

Are you ready to start off 2016 with some good news? The industrial real estate market in Central Pennsylvania is riding a wave of robust economic growth and all signs point to a continuing boom that could be the greatest in the sector’s history!

Looking at the fourth quarter data, our latest research confirms that the industrial sector of the local real estate market has now absorbed over 8.5 million square feet of warehouse space since first quarter 2015. With virtually every industrial sector experiencing increased demand—from data processing hubs to distribution space and manufacturing centers—the four quarters of 2015 saw more demand for industrial space than compared to the last 20 years.

What exactly is driving this demand and what other trends can we expect to result from this economic growth? Let’s take a look!

Three factors driving this high level of industrial demand:

Employment: Across the nation, the real GDP has been expanding at a better than 4% growth rate since April of 2014 (nearly 150 bps higher than the historical norm). The faster rate of growth has triggered a burst of new hiring across nearly all job sectors and geographies. The U.S. economy created 2.9 million net new nonfarm jobs in 2014, and more specifically, industrial employment grew by 442,000 net new payrolls in 2014 – the most industrial-related job growth in 17 years.

Looking specifically at Harrisburg-Carlisle MSA, the unemployment rate is 3.5 percent as of November 2015 and the lowest it has been in recent months. We also closed the year with 294,626 nonfarm jobs which is nearly 7,500 more jobs than last year at this time and among the highest we have seen throughout 2015.

Manufacturing: Adding to the good news is the ISM Manufacturing Index, which has been in solid expansion mode for 25 consecutive quarters. Such robust trends have led to a 5.2% year-over-year increase (nationally) in industrial production—a rate of growth that went unmatched throughout the 2000’s.

Again looking locally, Harrisburg-Carlisle MSA, Lancaster MSA and York-Hanover MSA each rank among the top 10 regions in the state for manufacturing jobs. Combined, these areas (that correlate with CoStar’s Central PA submarket) employ a total 89,356 people in this industry alone, as of second quarter 2015. Manufacturing jobs continue to trend upward after recovering from a major dip in 2010.

Oil Prices: The past six months of continually falling oil prices have given the bulk of the U.S. economy an additional boost and will provide another tailwind for growth moving forward. Since June of 2014, crude oil prices (WTI) have declined more than 50%, making the national average gas price $2.17 per gallon as of mid-January, 2015. Most consumers and businesses are responding favorably to the drop in energy prices, and consumer spending has ramped up for vehicle sales, durable goods, building materials, clothing and accessories, food and beverage, etc.

In the Harrisburg-Carlisle MSA, oil prices are down about 18.6 percent from last winter, beating the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s prediction of a 15 percent drop this winter. The average for heating oil was $2.999 on Dec. 1, according to the Energy Information Administration, compared with $3.683 a year ago. Local Marcellus Shale production has helped keep oil prices low while also adding jobs to the economy.

Final Takeaways

All of these factors bode well for industrial real estate, even as the rising value of the dollar and weakening economic conditions abroad present headwinds for the year ahead.

Additionally, new construction activity is showing no signs of slowing as there is currently 3.5 million square feet under construction in the Central Pennsylvania Submarket, of which 98% is being constructed on spec. The majority of new spec inventory is expected to deliver in the first quarter of 2016 and will push the overall vacancy rate northward for the market.

Despite the large amount of spec space coming online next quarter, tenant demand has been particularly strong in new inventory constructed over the past two years, evidenced by the market’s low vacancy and strong positive absorption.

The new space that has come into the market at the end of 2015 should continue this trend and generate a significant amount of activity in the near-term.

Which of the market factors discussed do you believe will be most powerful in 2016 and beyond? Join in the conversation by commenting below!

[Online Resources] Real Estate, 2015, 2016, article, blog, business, camp hill, carlisle, central pa, change, CRE, cumberland, data, dauphin, Economy, employment, future, growing, growth, harrisburg, hershey, impact, industrial, industry, information, jobs, land, manufacturing, market, mechanicsburg, Mike Kushner, money, msa, new year, news, numbers, oil, Omni Realty Group, pennsylvania, positive, prediction, recap, report, space, statistics, trends